Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31748 (MAD)

S.VENGATESAN v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/15314/2026 · 2026-06-02

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 15314 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 15314 of 2026 S.Vengatesan S/o.Subramani No.01/18A, Kovil Street Arumbakkam Village Arcot Kuppam Post Tiruthani Taluk Thiruvallur District 631204. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Office of the District Collector Tiruvallur. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Office of the Revenue Divisional Office Tiruthani. 3. The Tahsildar Thirutani Taluk Thiruvallur. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to grant patta in favour of the petitioner in respect of the land measuring 0.3 cents in Survey Nos.122/6 and 122/7 in Arumbakkam Village, Arcot Kuppam Post, Tiruthani Taluk Thiruvallur District classfied as Punja Anadeenam based on the representation dated 18.03.2026. For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Ashokkumar __________ Page1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 15314 of 2026 For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Senthamizh Selvan, Govt’s counsel ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.03.2026. 2. Mr.M.Senthamizh Selvan, learned Government's counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed a representation dated 18.03.2026 before the 3rd respondent, requesting for issuance of patta pertaining to the subject property. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the 3rd respondent till date. Hence, this petition. 5. In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner’s representation will be disposed of within a period of 8 weeks and hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders. __________ Page2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 15314 of 2026 6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record. 7. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 3rd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 18.03.2026 and dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 8. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 9. Post this matter for reporting compliance on 07.07.2026. 02-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No nsa To 1. The District Collector Office of the District Collector Tiruvallur. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Office of the Revenue Divisional Office Tiruthani. __________ Page3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 15314 of 2026 3. The Tahsildar Thirutani Taluk Thiruvallur. __________ Page4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 15314 of 2026 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa WP No. 15314 of 2026 02-06-2026 __________ Page5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis