1 CGHC010294212022 2026:CGHC:34442 NAFR HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPL No. 109 of 2022 Rastriya Jute Mazdoor Sangh Through General Secretary, Jagdish Singh S/o Late Shri Brijbihari Singh, Age About 64 Years, R/o Jute Mill Labour Colony, Sarangarh Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1- State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department of Labour, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Deputy Labour Commissioner, office of Labour Commissioner, Indirawati Bhawan, Block -3, 2nd Floor, Atal Nagar, Raipur,, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Mohan Jute Mill Limited, A Company Duly Incorporated Under The Provisions of The Companies Act Through Its Authorized Signatory, 1 Kyd Street 16-A, Palace Cout, Kolkata, District Kolkata (West Bengal). 4 - Collector Raigarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. S. P. Kale, Advocate For State For Respondent No.3 : : Mr. Anil S. Pandey, Government Advocate Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Senior Advocate assisted by Ms. Shrishti Singh, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 06/08/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE 2 “10.1 Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire record from the respondent authorities pursuant to R.R.C. issued against the respondent no.3. 10.2 Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct respondent authorities to recover R.R.C. amount against the respondent no.3. 10.3 Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief as deemed fit and proper.” 2. Despite repeated opportunities, the petitioner failed to produce any RRC issued against Respondent No. 3. 3. As no recovery proceedings are pending against Respondent No. 3, I do not find any valid reason to keep this writ petition pending. Accordingly, this writ petition is hereby dismissed. 4. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to revive its prayer if any RRC issued by the competent authority is found to be in existence against Respondent No. 3. Sd/- Rakesh Mohan Pandey JUDGE Nadim