CWP-5455-2026 [1] 123 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-5455-2026 Date of decision: 20.07.2026 Khajan Singh Yadav ...Petitioner Versus Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran (HSVP), Panchkula and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Sharad Choudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harmanjot Singh Gill, Advocate for the respondents. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a Civil Writ Petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to handover the physical possession along with proper demarcation of plot No.5, Sector 51, Gurugram, Haryana. 2. On 11.03.2026, following order was passed:- “Present:- Mr. Sharad Choudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. **** Counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner’s grandfather was allotted/re-allotted plot thrice, because the earlier allotted plots were disputed. He submits that the last allotment was made vide letter, dated 23.06.2014, Annexure P- PAWAN KUMAR 2026.07.21 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-5455-2026 [2] 6, whereby Plot No.5, Sector 51, Gurugram, was allotted. He submits that by virtue of the impugned Show Cause Notice, dated 19.08.2021, Annexure P-8, respondents have threatened to cancel the allotment of plot No.1306, Sector 51, Gurugram, which was a disputed plot. He asserts that in lieu of this plot, Plot No.5, Sector 51, Gurugram already stood allotted to petitioner’s grandfather, who has expired in the year 2022. Counsel states that petitioner has a Will, dated 01.11.2019, Annexure P-1, in his favour and has sent response to the impugned Show Cause Notice, which has not been withdrawn by the respondents. Advance copy of the petition has been served upon the respondents. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Advocate puts in appearance on behalf of the respondents-HSVP and requests for deferment to get instructions. List on 20.04.2026. 11.03.2026” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for his grievance, the petitioner has also given representation dated 18.12.2024 to Estate Officer-II, Gurugram-respondent No.2 and would be satisfied at this stage, in case respondent No.2 is directed to decide the same in a time bound manner. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that the said representation dated 18.12.2024 would be considered and decided by respondent No.2, within a period of three weeks from today and in case the pleas of the petitioner are found to be meritorious then necessary relief would also be granted to the petitioner. 5. Keeping in view the abovesaid facts and circumstances, the PAWAN KUMAR 2026.07.21 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-5455-2026 [3] present writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide representation dated 18.12.2024 by passing a speaking order within a period of three weeks from today. In case, respondent No.2 finds that the pleas raised by the petitioner are meritorious then necessary relief would also be granted to the petitioner expeditiously. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 20.07.2026 Pawan Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2026.07.21 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document