Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3174 (AP)

T. Lakshmi Narayana, v. Sri G Sai Prasad, I.A.S.,

CC/569/2026 · 2026-06-18

V Sujatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010069652026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 569 of 2026 Between: 1. T. LAKSHMI NARAYANA,, S/O. T. ANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 1-6, TIKKISETTI VARI VEEDHI, B SAVARAM, RAZOLE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI G SAI PRASAD I A S, OCC THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT IRRIGATION AND CAD WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, OCC THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT FINANCE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. DR MAHESH KUMAR RAVIRALA I A S, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, (IRRIGATION WING) AMALAPURAM, DR BR AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT. 4. SHRI SAGILI SHAN MOHAN I A S, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,( IRRIGATION WING) KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 5. SRI K GOPINADH, THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, DOWALESWARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. SRI RAMAKRISHNA, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION AND WATER, RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GODAVARI EASTERN DIVISION, RAMACHANDRAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. SRI SK JILANI, THE PAY AND ACCOUNT OFFICER, DOWILESWARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents U/s. 10 to 12 of contempt of Court Acts for willful and deliberate violation of Final order passed in WP No 24345/2025 dated 06.10.2025 by Learned Single Judge and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense with appearance of the Respondent No. 1 on 19.06.2026 in C.C No.569 of 2026, in the interest of justice. IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of Respondent No.2 on 19.06.2026, as directed by this Hon’ble Court vide order dated 07.05.2026, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ANNAMNEEDI BALAKRISHNA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI 3. T LAKSHMI PADMAJA The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 569 OF 2026 ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the Respondents/ Contemnors for Contempt of Court for willful and deliberate disobedience in not comply the orders passed by this Court, dated 06.10.2025 in W.P.No.24345 of 2025. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Contemnors has furnished a copy of the letter dated 19.06.2026 addressed by Principal Secretary to Government, Finance Department to the Government Pleader for Finance, wherein it is mentioned that a net amounts of Rs.2,57,536/-, Rs.3,38,750/-, Rs.3,51,457/- and Rs.1,83,466/- has been cleared on 19.06.2026, vide Bill Nos. 2026-7716528, 2026-7751668, 2026-7751693 and 2026-7733774 in compliance to the orders of this Court and requested to close the Contempt Case. Recording the submissions made, the Contempt Case is closed. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to claim remaining amounts, if any payable by the Respondents. The miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed.s ____________________ JUSTICE V. SUJATHA Date: 19.06.2026 KK