SMT A C LALITHAMMA v. SRI Y N LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY
RFA/577/2019 · 2026-06-04
Rajesh Rai K
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 31735 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 31735 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34218 RFA No. 577 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 577 OF 2019 BETWEEN:
SMT A C LALITHAMMA W/O. N RAMASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/AT NO. 195, NILIGIRI PAPANNA BLOCK, SRIRAMAPURA, BENGALURU 560021. REP BY GPA HOLDER. R. MOHANKUMAR. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. RAMESHA B M., ADVOCATE) AND:
SRI Y N LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY S/O. LATE. NANJAPPAREDDY, SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS
1. SMT. Y L TRIVENI D/O. LATE. Y N LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
2. SMT. Y L ARUNA D/O. LATE. Y N LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
3. SMT. Y L VIJAYA D/O. LATE. Y N LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
Digitally signed by MAMATHA K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34218 RFA No. 577 of 2019
4. SMT. Y L VINUTHA D/O. LATE. Y N LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
5. SMT. Y L MAMATHA D/O. LATE. Y N LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
6. SMT. Y L VEENA D/O. LATE. Y N LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 6 ARE R/AT NO.927, 5TH CROSS, MATHIKERE MAIN ROAD, K.N.EXTENSION, YESHWANTHPURA BENGALURU
7. SRI. Y L AMARENDRA BABU S/O. LATE. Y N LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT 5TH CROSS, K.N. EXTENSION, YESHWANTHPURA, BENGALURU
8. SRI. R. RAGHUNATHA REDDY S/O. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT NO.1338, 2ND MAIN, 1ST CROSS, KN EXTENSION, YESHWANTHPURA, BENGALURU
9. SRI. S R SRIDHAR S/O. LATE. S V RATNAIAH,
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34218 RFA No. 577 of 2019
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT NO. 220/Y, 13TH MAIN, 3RD BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SHANMUKHAPPA ., ADVOCATE for R8 & R9) R1, R3 to R7) are served. This Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of CPC against the Judgment and Decree dated 20.03.2018 passed in O.S.No.9440/2004 on the file of the VII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru dismissing the suit for declaration and permanent injunction. This Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the court made the following:
ORAL ORDER
Despite granting opportunities to the appellants to take steps in respect of respondent No.2, the same is not complied. Today there is no representation for the appellants.
Though this appeal is of the year 2019, in the interest of justice, finally a week’s time is granted to take steps. Failing which, appeal shall be dismissed without reference to the Bench. Sd/- JUDGE
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34218 RFA No. 577 of 2019
NOTE: Court Order dt.04.06.2026 not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed. COPY
Sd/-
I/C ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By: BR R By: NR C By: STE