PRIYANKA MEENA D/O SH. HARFOOL MEENA, v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/359/2026 · 2026-03-09
Anil Kumar Upman
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 317 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 317 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:10129] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 359/2026
1. Priyanka Meena D/o Sh. Harfool Meena, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Jailalpura, Tehsil Bonli District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) At Present R/o Village Mohanpura, Gurjar Basti, Parli, Tehsil And District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.)
2. Vimal Meena S/o Sh. Mastram Meena, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village Mohanpura, Gurjar Basti, Parli, Tehsil And District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs Govt. Secretariat Jaipur.
2. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur.
3. The Superintendent Of Police, Sawai Madhopur District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.)
4. The Additional Superintendent Of Police/Nodal Officer, Special Investigation Unit Crime Against Women, Cell, Sawai Madhopur District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.)
5. The Station House Officer Police Station, Kundera, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.).
6. Harfool Meena S/o Sh. Bhanwar Lal Meena, R/o Jailalpura, Tehsil Bonli District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Teeka Ram Meena, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 09/03/2026
1. Defects pointed out by the registry are overruled.
[2026:RJ-JP:10129] (2 of 3) [CRLW-359/2026]
2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel.
3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent No.6 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondent.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. It is submitted that the petitioners are living in a live-in-relationship and in this regard, an agreement dated 01.03.2026 has also been executed between them, which has been annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent No.6 is not happy with their relationship and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondent, so they prayed for protection.
5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are
directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.5 - Station House Officer, Police Station Kundera, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) and respondent No.5 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners.
6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
[2026:RJ-JP:10129] (3 of 3) [CRLW-359/2026]
8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/294