Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31699 (CHH)

SARASWATI DEWANGAN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

REVP/121/2025 · 2026-08-04

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010185862025 2026:CGHC:34313 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 121 of 2025 1. Saraswati Dewangan W/o Late Surendra Dewangan Aged About 49 Years R/o Sanjay Nagar, Ward No. 13, Kurud, Tehsil - Kurud, District - Dhamtari Chhattisgarh (Resp. No. 5 In Writ Petition) 2. Sonal Dewangan D/o Late Surendra Dewangan Aged About 19 Years R/o Sanjay Nagar, Ward No. 13, Kurud, Tehsil - Kurud, District - Dhamtari Chhattisgarh (Resp. No. 6 In Writ Petition) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Director Directorate Of Public Instructions, Chhattisgarh, Indravati Bhawan, Block-3, 1st Floor, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 3. District Education Officer Dhamtari, District - Dhamtari Chhattisgarh 4. Block Education Officer Kurud, District - Dhamtari Chhattisgarh 5. Roshan Kumar Dewangan S/o Late Surendra Kumar Dewangan Aged About 34 Years R/o Ward No. 15, Shikshak Colony, Kurud, Tehsil - Kurud, District - Dhamtari Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr. Gagan Tiwari, Advocate For State : Ms. Saumya Sharma, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No. 5 : Mr. Aniket Verma, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 05.08 .2026 1. Mr. Gagan Tiwari, Advocate, on instruction, would submit that review petitioner No. 1 has been considered for grant of compassionate SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2026.08.05 17:04:06 +0530 2 appointment, therefore, petitioners may be permitted to withdraw this petition. 2. No objection from the other side. 3. Permission granted. 4. Accordingly, instant review petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. However, the review petitioners would be at liberty to revive their prayer, if cause of action still survives. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE $iddhant