Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31691 (KAR)

M/S SV2 INTERIORS v. MR. M.S. VIJAYASARATHY

CRL.RP/749/2025 · 2026-07-29

H P Sandesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010324362025 NC: 2026:KHC:39590 CRL.RP No. 749 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.749 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. M/S. SV2 INTERIORS, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR MR. KALIMUTTU, S/O PALANI, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO.104, SANJAY GANDHI NAGARA, PIPE LINE ROAD, YESHWANTHPURA, BENGALURU-560022. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAGARAJA G, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. MR. M.S. VIJAYASARATHY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O LATE MR.M.V.SHINANJAPPA, R/AT “GIRIYAMMA”, NO.405, 7TH MAIN, 2ND STAGE “A” BLOCK, MALLESHWARAM WEST, BENGALURU-560055. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SATYANARAYAN CHALKE, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C (FILED U/S 438 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND ORDER DATED 11.03.2025, IN CRIMINAL Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010324362025 NC: 2026:KHC:39590 CRL.RP No. 749 of 2025 APPEAL NO.1419/2023 PASSED BY THE HONBLE LXIX ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-70) AT BENGALURU AND THE JUDGEMENT AND ORDER DATED 01.09.2023 PASSED BY THE IV ADDL. SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND ADL.CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, AT BENGALURU IN CC NO.11411/2022 AND BE PLEASED TO PASS THE ORDER OF ACQUITTAL AND ACQUITTING THE PETITIONER OF THE CHARGE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER The junior counsel for the revision petitioner on the previous occasion took time on the ground that the father of the Senior Counsel passed away on the very day and he went to Bellary and hence, this Court granted time. 2. Today the matter is called twice both in the morning session and also in the afternoon session and there is no representation on behalf of the revision petitioner. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed in view of non-pursuing of the matter with diligence. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27