MUKESH SINGH RAJPUT v. DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LIMITED
WPS/197/2021 · 2026-03-19
Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3168 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3168 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:13408
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 197 of 2021 1 - Mukesh Singh Rajput S/o Shri Trilok Singh Rajput Aged About 48 Years Post Ex-Samiti Prabandhak, Samiti Silghat, Registration No. 3, At Present R/o Thengabhatha, Tahsil Dhamdha, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner versus 1 - District Cooperative Central Bank Limited Durg District Durg, Through Chief Executive Officer, District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For petitioner : Mr. Praveen Dhurandhar, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Abhinav Tiwari, Advocate holding the
brief of Mr. Manish Upadhyay, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Order on Board 20.03.2026 Heard.
1. At the very outset, Mr. Dhurandhar, Advocate would submit that against the order passed by the Registrar, Cooperative Society, C.G., a second appeal lies before the Cooperative Tribunal according to the provision of Section 78(2) of the Chhattisgarh Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 (for short ‘the Act of 1960’). He would further submit that the order was passed by the Registrar, Cooperative Societies way back on 30.03.2016, whereas, prescribed period of limitation to prefer a second appeal is 60
-2- days. He would contend that the petitioner may be permitted to prefer a duly constituted appeal before the Second Appellate Authority i.e. Cooperative Tribunal and the said authority may be
directed to consider the appeal on merits.
2. On the other hand, Mr. Tiwari, Advocate appearing for the respondent would oppose submission.
3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the record.
4. Taking into consideration submissions advanced by the petitioner, this petition is disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to prefer a second appeal under the provision of Section 78 (2) of the Act of 1960 before the Cooperative Tribunal, within a period of 30 days from today and in turn, the Second Appellate Authority i.e. Cooperative Tribunal shall make all endevours to conclude the proceedings preferably within a period of 120 days from the date of filing of second appeal.
5. With the aforesaid observation(s)/direction(s), the present petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge Rekha