SREE MANDALI ENTERPRISES PARTNER v. G SAI PRASAD, IAS
CC/396/2026 · 2026-06-18
V Sujatha
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3168 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3168 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010032842026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 396 OF 2026 Between:
1. SREE MANDALI ENTERPRISES PARTNER, MP SANAKA KOTA VENKATA RENUKA RAVI VARA PRASAD S/O NAGA BASAVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O D.NO.12, NAGAYALANKA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. G SAI PRASAD IAS, PRINCIPLE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT IRRIGATION AND CAD WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS,
VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI D K BALAJI I A S, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR (IRRIGATION WING) MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. SRI R MOHAN RAO, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R DISTRICT
5. SRI R RAVI KIRAN, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT,
KRISHNA CENTRAL DIVISION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may
be pleased to punish the respondents U/s. 10 to 12 of contempt's of Court Acts for willful and deliberate violation of Final order passed in WP No 28309/2025 dated 17.11.2025 by Learned Single Judge and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of the copy of the order dated 17.11.2025 passed in W.P. No. 28309 of 2025 in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. ANNAMNEEDI BALAKRISHNA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA
2. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 396 OF 2026 ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the Respondents/ Contemnors for Contempt of Court for willful and deliberate disobedience in not comply the orders passed by this Court, dated 17.11.2025 in W.P.No.28309 of 2025.
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Contemnors has furnished a copy of the letter dated 19.06.2026 addressed by Principal Secretary to Government, Finance Department to the Government Pleader for Finance, wherein it is mentioned that a net amount of Rs.18,73,539/-; 11,35,562/- and 18,38,719/- has been cleared on 19.06.2026, vide Bill Nos. 2026-7753293; 2026-7763698 and 2026-775465 respectively in compliance to the orders of this Court and requested to close the Contempt Case. Recording the submissions made, the Contempt Case is closed. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to claim remaining amounts, if any payable by the Respondents. The miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE V. SUJATHA Date: 19.06.2026 KK