1 CGHC010348182023 2026:CGHC:37542-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2368 of 2023 Ranjeet Kumar Badjena S/o Praffulla Kumar Badjena Aged About 46 Years Occupation - Managing Director, Badjena Iron And Steel Industries Private Limited, Head Office - Hig-165, Kanan Bihar Phase - I, Patiya, Bhuvneshwar, Orrisa R/o - Village Uplai, P.O. - Nagon, District Jajpur, Orrisa ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station - Old Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh 2. Rajesh Kumar Shah S/o Kanhaiya Lal Sah Aged About 42 Years R/o New Khusripara, Jagir Chowk, Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh ...Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Ishan Verma, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, Government Advocate. For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. B.P. Singh, Advocate. BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2026.08.24 11:34:35 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 21 .08.2026 1. Heard Mr. Ishan Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondent No. 1 and Mr. B.P. Singh, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No. 2. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the instant petition and quash/set-aside the FIR dated 10.04.2019 bearing Crime No. 172 of 2019, registered at Police Station Old Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh and the subsequent charge-sheet dated 12.10.2021 filed against the petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 406 and 420 of IPC and other proceedings pending if any against the petitioner pursuant to Crime No. 172 of 2019 registered at Police Station Old Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh in the interest of justice.” 3 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the trial is at the verge of completion and, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition. 4. Learned State Counsel and learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 2 submit that they have no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 5. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, without any further liberty. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan