1 CGHC010277592019 2026:CGHC:36190 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6565 of 2019 1 - Jageshwar Dubey S/o Late Jeevan Lal Dubey Aged About 48 Years Working As Maali In O/o Respondent No. 3, R/o In Front Of Water Tank Kududand, Gayatri Mandir Chowk Police Station Civil Line, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Chandra Kumar Nagdoune S/o Late Ganesh Rao Aged About 56 Years Working As Electrician In The O/o Respondent No. 3, R/o Ambedkar Nagar, Police Station Civil Line, Magarpara, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Mirza Wahid Baig S/o Late M H A Baig Aged About 43 Years Working As Time Keeper In The O/o Respondent No. 3, R/o Masanganj, Police Station Civil Line Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Petrik Pasty S/o J. Pasty Aged About 53 Years Working As Maali In O/o Respondent No. 3, R/o Near Water Tank, Pump House Road, Torwa, Police Station Torwa, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Urban Administration And Development Department, New Mantralaya, New Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Secretary Department Of General Administration, Mantralaya, New Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Municipal Corropration Bilaspur Through Its Commissioner Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Faiz Kazi, Advocate For Respondent/State For Respondent No. 3 : : Mr. Sharad Mishra, P.L. Mr. Pranjal Shukla, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, Judge Order on Board 14.08.2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking for following relief(s):- 10.1. This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to hold that Action of the Respondents in not REGULARIZING Digitally signed by JYOTI JHA Date: 2026.08.14 17:54:30 +0530 2 THE SERVICES of the Petitioners is Totally Arbitrary, Capricious besides being Violative of Article 14, 16 & 21 of the Constitution Of India. 10.2. That the Respondents may kindly be directed to Grant the benefit of the Regularisation to the Petitioners which was extended to other Similarly Sitated Employee & Juniors Employees in Consonance with the G.A.D Circular Dated 05.03.2008 (ANNEXURE-P/23). 10.3 That the entire Records of the case may kindly be called, for revealing gross and palpable injustice caused to the Petitioner. 10.4. Any Other Relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the Petitioner together with cost of the Petition. C. This Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to 10.5 Any other relief as the Hon'ble Court may be deemed fit and proper with cost of petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have submitted a representation (Annexure P/16) before respondent No. 3 seeking regularization of their services. However, the said representation has not yet been considered and decided. He, therefore, confines his prayer to a direction to the competent authority to consider and decide the said representation, in accordance with law, within a stipulated period. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 3 does not oppose the limited prayer made on behalf of the petitioners. 4. Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, respondent No. 3/competent authority is directed to consider and decide the representation (Annexure P/16) submitted by the petitioners, in accordance with law, within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioners shall be at liberty to submit an additional representation along with all relevant documents, if so advised. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the case. 6. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Jyoti