CGHC010318842026 2026:CGHC:37008 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2185 of 2026 1 - Rohit Singh Thakur S/o Hoshiyar Singh, Aged About 34 Years R/o J. K. D. Road Manendragarh, Tahsil Manendragarh, District Manendragarh- Chirmiri-Bharatpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, P. S. Manendragarh, District Koriya (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Parag Kotecha, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Tarkeshwar Nande, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Judgment on Board 19.08.2026 1. The present application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C has been filed by the petitioner for quashment of the order dated 14.11.2025 and 18.05.2026 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Manendragarh, District – Koriya in Case No. 434/2021 whereby the learned trial Court has cancelled the bail KISHORE KUMAR DESHMUKH Digitally signed by KISHORE KUMAR DESHMUKH Date: 2026.08.19 18:32:42 +0530 and issued permanent warrant of arrest against the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the State would submit that the present Cr.M.P. is not maintainable against an interlocutory order and against such order, Revision is maintainable therefore, he would pray for dismissal of the Cr.M.P. in present form. 3. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the State and also the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Amarnath and Others vs. State of Haryana {(1977) 4 SCC 137}, Madhu Limaye vs. State of Maharashtra {1977 (4) SCC 551} and Mohit @ Sonu and Another vs. State of U.P. and Another {(2013) 7 SCC 789} wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that the order which has culminated the proceeding cannot be an interlocutory order. In the present facts of the case, learned trial Court has, not only cancelled the bail but also issued warrant of arrest, therefore, the order impugned is not an interlocutory order, against which revision is maintainable not the present petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. 4. Accordingly, the present Cr.M.P. is dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to prefer Criminal Revision before the learned Sessions Court. 5. The Certified copy of the impugned order be returned to the counsel for the petitioner, after obtaining an attested photocopy of the same. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge kishore