Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31663 (PAT)

Ramesh Kumar Singh @ Ramesh Singh v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./3553/2026 · 2026-02-11

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3553 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-330 Year-2025 Thana- PIPRA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1. Ramesh Kumar Singh @ Ramesh Singh S/o Late Satya Narain Singh R/o Village- Chakbara Bakhari, P.S-Pipra, District- East Champaran 2. Rakesh Singh S/o Late Ram Chandra Singh R/o Village- Chakbara Bakhari, P.S-Pipra, District- East Champaran 3. Rajesh Kumar Singh S/o Prabhu Narayan Singh R/o Village- Chakbara Bakhari, P.S-Pipra, District- East Champaran 4. Prashray Raj S/o Ramesh Singh @ Ramesh Kumar Singh R/o Village- Chakbara Bakhari, P.S-Pipra, District- East Champaran 5. Prabhu Narayan Singh S/o Late Dhenu Singh @ Dhenuk Singh R/o Village- Chakbara Bakhari, P.S-Pipra, District- East Champaran 6. Dinesh Kumar Singh S/o Late Ram Chandra Singh R/o Village- Chakbara Bakhari, P.S-Pipra, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vijay Shankar Shrivastava For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Tapeshwar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 11-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 126 ( 2 ), 115 ( 2 ), 109 (1) , 118 , 303 ( 2 ), 324 ( 4 ), 74, 351 ( 2 ), 352, and 3 (5) of BNS. 3. As per F.I.R., all the named accused persons including these petitioners, armed with lathi, fatta, khanti Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3553 of 2026(3) dt.11-02-2026 2/3 assaulted informant and her family members. It is further alleged that accused persons also indiscriminately fired and threatened informant with dire consequences. They also disrobed informant and snatched gold Sikri from her. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to dispute over passage led to free-fight between the parties, in which, both sides sustained injuries. Case and counter case. Injuries, sustained by the injured, are simple in nature. Rest of the allegations are ornamental in nature to make the case grave. Similarly situated co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court, vide order dated 21.01.2026 passed in Cr.Misc. No. 837 of 2026. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 6. Considering the nature of injury and clean antecedent, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the petitioners, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Motihari East Champaran in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 330 of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3553 of 2026(3) dt.11-02-2026 3/3 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. anay (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T