Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31656 (MAD)

R and C Environment lab v. Commercial Tax Officer

WP/19824/2026 · 2026-06-10

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 19824 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 19824 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.21150 & 21152 of 2026 R & C Environment lab Represented by its Partner Vijayabalan Arun Kumar, No. 1/61, Kulakari Street , Adayalampet Maduravoyal , Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 095. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Commercial Tax Officer Vanagaram Assessement Circle, Integrated CT Building, No.4/109, Chennai Bangalore High Way, Varatharajapuram, Nazrathpet Ponamalle, Kanchipuram District, Tamilnadu - 600 123. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the respondent vide his Order of Assessment bearing Reference No ZD331125427992D in GSTIN/ 33AAYFR6493A1ZT/2021-2022 dated 25.11.2025 and to quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Saravanan G For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, Government Counsel (Tax) *********** ORDER https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19824 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 An order dated 25.11.2025 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed shortly after the period of limitation expired. 4. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to remit 25% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle. 5. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. Subject to fulfilment of the above condition, the bank attachment shall stand raised. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19824 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 10-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To Commercial Tax Officer Vanagaram Assessement Circle, Integrated CT Building, No.4/109, Chennai Bangalore High Way, Varatharajapuram, Nazrathpet Ponamalle, Kanchipuram District, Tamilnadu - 600 123. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19824 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 19824 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.21150 & 21152 of 2026 10-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis