APURVA 2026.07.21 18:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh the petitioner was further confronted with the fact that the order dated 01.04.2026 (Annexure P-1) did not stipulate any time frame within which the aforesaid representation was required to be decided. That apart, the present contempt petition has been filed not against the concerned Sub Divisional Magistrate (Civil), Tauru, District Nuh, before whom the representation dated 08.12.2025 was pending, but against the Deputy Commissioner, Nuh. 3. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present contempt petition with liberty to the petitioner to avail other remedies as may be available to him in accordance with law. 4. Keeping in view the aforesaid submisssions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. 5. All the pending application(s), if any, shall also stand closed. APURVA 2026.07.21 18:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh