Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3165 (RAJ)

PADAM KUMAR CHANDWAR S/O SHRI NEMI CHAND JI CHANDWAR, v. RAJKUMAR CHANDWAR S/O SHRI NEMICHAND CHANDWAR

CCP/1296/2023 · 2026-04-28

Ravi Chirania

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:18075] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1296/2023 In S.B. Civil First Appeal No.88/2021 1. Padam Kumar Chandwar S/o Shri Nemi Chand Ji Chandwar, R/o Shantinath Ji Ke Mandir Ki Gali, Kasba Jhalarapatan, District Jhalawar (Raj.) At Present Resident Of Plot No. 10, Yamunapath Suraj Nagar (West), Civil Lines, Jaipur. 2. Taramani Chandwar W/o Shri Padam Kumar Chandwar, R/o Shantinath Ji Ke Mandir Ki Gali, Kasba Jhalarapatan, District Jhalawar (Raj.) At Present Resident Of Plot No. 10, Yamunapath Suraj Nagar (West), Civil Lines, Jaipur. Since Deceased Through His Legal Representatives- 3. Meena Sogani D/o Smt. Taramani @ Padam Kumar W/o Manish Sogani, R/o Karuna Building Manarve Mandir Road, 5Th Floor, Flat No. 10, Balkeshwar Road, Mumbai (Maharastra). 4. Dharmendra Jain S/o Smt. Taramani And Padam Kumar, Resident Of Plot No. 10, Yamunapath Suraj Nagar (West), Civil Lines, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Rajkumar Chandwar S/o Shri Nemichand Chandwar, R/o Shantinath Ke Mandir Ki Gali, Kasba Jhalarapatan, District Jhalawar (Raj.). 2. Gajendra Kumar Chandwar S/o Shri Nemi Chand Chandwar, R/o Shantinath Ke Mandir Ki Gali, Kasba Jhalarapatan, District Jhalawar (Raj.) At Present R/o Srishti Complex Yamuna-4-B, 4Th Floor, Meera Road, Mumbai. 3. Manimala W/o Shri Gajendra Kumar Chandwar, R/o Shantinath Ke Mandir Ki Gali, Kasba Jhalarapatan, District Jhalawar (Raj.) At Present R/o Srishti Complex Yamuna- 4-B, 4Th Floor, Meera Road, Mumbai. ----Respondents [2026:RJ-JP:18075] (2 of 2) [CCP-1296/2023] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. J.P. Goyal, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Yashika Vijayvargia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ram Naresh Vijay, Mr. Laxmikant Sharma & Mr. Ayush Tak HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 28/04/2026 Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioners and the respondents are family members, and therefore, they do not want to contest the present contempt petition and wishes to settle the dispute amicably. The contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Notices are discharged. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J Monika/123