Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31648 (MAD)

Vinoth v. Vimala

CRP/3127/2026 · 2026-06-09

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C.R.P.Nos.3127 & 3128 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09.06.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE C.R.P.Nos.3127 & 3128 of 2026 and C.M.P.Nos.13590 & 13595 of 2026 Vinoth ... Petitioner in both CRP Vs. Vimala ... Respondent in both CRP Prayer in C.R.P.No.3127 of 2026 : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 06.02.2026 made in I.A.No.2 of 2025 in O.S.No.294 of 2023 on the file of the Sub ordinate Judge, Palacode. Prayer in C.R.P.No.3128 of 2026 : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 06.02.2026 made in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in O.S.No.294 of 2023 on the file of the Sub ordinate Judge, Palacode. For Petitioner (in both CRP) : Mr.J.Pradeep For Respondent (in both CRP) : Notice dispensed with ***** Page No.1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.Nos.3127 & 3128 of 2026 COMMON ORDER These Civil Revision Petitions have been filed challenging the impugned orders, both dated 06.02.2026 passed in I.A.Nos.2 and 1 of 2025 in O.S.No.294 of 2023 on the file of the Sub Court, Palacode, dismissing the applications filed by the petitioner for (a) sending the documents for expert examination u/s 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, and (b) reopen and recall the defendant’s side witness. 2. Since no adverse order is passed against the respondent in these civil revision petitions, notice to the respondent in these civil revision petitions is dispensed with by this Court. 3. Under the impugned orders, the trial court has refused to entertain the applications filed by the petitioner on the ground that it has been filed at a belated stage. Admittedly, the applications were filed by the petitioner during the arguments stage in the main suit. The petitioner is the defendant in the suit. This Court does not find any infirmity in the reasons given by the trial court for dismissing the interlocutory applications filed by the petitioner. Page No.2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.Nos.3127 & 3128 of 2026 4. Accordingly, these Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellenous petitions are closed. 09.06.2026 Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No sp To The Sub Court, Palacode. Page No.3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.Nos.3127 & 3128 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE , J. sp C.R.P.Nos.3127 & 3128 of 2026 09.06.2026 Page No.4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis