1 CGHC010204742026 2026:CGHC:35352 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 736 of 2026 Vipin Chourasiya S/o Late Tulsiram Chourasiya Aged About 38 Years R/o LIG J/14, Ward No. 32, Dindayal Awas, Housing Board Colony Near Pani Tanki Rampur, Korba- District Korba Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner/Applicant versus 1 - Mr. Vikas Sheel (I.A.S.), Chief Secretary, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nava Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Mr. Rajesh Sukumar Toppo (I.A.S.) Secretary, Department Of Water Resources, Government Of Chhattissagrh Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nava Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Mr. Amitabh Jain Chhattisgarh. Infrastructure Development Corporation C.G. Skill Development Authority Bhawan, Old Police Headquarter Campus, Raipur District Raipur C.G. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Mohd. Naqeeb, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Malay Shrivastava, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 11.08.2026 1. This contempt petition under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1941 has been preferred by the applicant with a following prayer:- BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2026.08.13 10:12:06 +0530 2 (a) To initiate Contempt proceedings against the Contemnors/Respondents under the relevant provisions of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 as well as Article 215 of the Constitution of India. (b) Further be pleased to pass appropriate order for compliance of the orders dated 13/04/206 passed in W.A. No.293/2026 and other dated 11/04/2025 passed in Writ Petition (S) No.2480/2025 passed by the Hon’ble Court for providing compassionate appointment to the Petitioner, to secure the ends of justice. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for respondent No.1 submits that vide Order dated 06.08.2026 passed by the Coordinate Bench in MCC No.725/2026, the period for compliance of the Order dated 11.04.2025 passed in WPS No.2480/2025 has been extended for a further period of six months. 3. Having considered the fact that further period of six months time has been granted for compliance with the order under contempt, this Court is not inclined to keep this petition pending, hence, the same is disposed of at this stage. Consequently, the rule issued is recalled. However, liberty is left with the applicant to file fresh contempt petition, if occasion so arises. 4. Accordingly, this contempt petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Bini