1 CGHC010310302022 2026:CGHC:37619 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 1067 of 2022 1 - Smt. Sourabh Singh W/o Late Umesh Chandra Singh Aged About 40 Years Occupation - House Wife , R/o Jutemill Road, Raigarh, Tehsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. (Claimant) 2 - Master Viyan Singh S/o Late Umesh Chandra Singh Aged About 10 Years Through His Natural Guardian (Mother) Smt. Sourabh Singh, W/o Late Umesh Chandra Singh, R/o Jutemill Road, Raigarh, Tehsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. (Claimant) ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - Sardar Harakbir Singh S/o Sardar Baljeet Singh R/o 71/1b Industrial Area, Najafgarh Road, New Delhi – 110015 2 - Sardar Baljeet Singh S/o Late Sardar Dalit Singh R/o 71/1b Industrial Area, Najafgarh Road, New Delhi – 110015. 3 - S.B.I. General Insurance Shakha 7-B, Bhutal Pusa Road, Opposite Metro Pillar 153, New Delhi (Insurer) 4 - Shanti Devi W/o Brij Mohan Singh Aged About 75 Years R/o Village Budhau, Post Office - Budhau, Police Station - Garhwal, District Baliya, Uttar Pradesh. 5 - Brij Mohan Singh S/o Late Kalpanath Singh Aged About 91 Years R/o Village Budhau, Post Office - Budhau, Police Station - Garhwal, District Baliya, Uttar Pradesh. ... Respondent(s) BHOLA NATH KHATAI Digitally signed by BHOLA NATH KHATAI Date: 2026.08.22 14:12:08 +0530 2 For Appellants : None For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Harshmander Rastogi, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order On Board 21/08/2026 1. The present appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act has been filed against the impugned award dated 25.06.2022 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Raigarh, CG in M.A.C.T. No.104/2015. 2. On the previous date of hearing, i.e., 07.05.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants. 3. Today, when the matter was called for hearing on second round, there was again no representation on behalf of the appellants, which shows that the appellants are no longer interested in pursuing the appeal. 4. Hence, in the absence of any representation on behalf of the appellants, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 5. Accordingly, the present appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) JUDGE Khatai