Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31610 (MAD)

Parimala v. The District Collector

WP/16356/2026 · 2026-06-02

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 16356 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 16356 of 2026 Parimala ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector, Collectorate, Kallakurichi - 606 202. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), RDO Office, Kallakurichi - 606 202. 3. The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Kallakurichi - 606 202. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to consider the Petitioner's representation dated 11.03.2026 and consequently issue patta in favour of the Petitioner in respect of the Grama Natham land measuring an extent of 2.75 cents in Survey No.174/34 situated at Tharnapuri Village, Kallakurichi Taluk, Kallakurichi District. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Sivapandi For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Government’s Counsel ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 11.03.2026. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 16356 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made a representation dated 11.03.2026 before the respondents to issue patta on his favour in respect of the Grama Natham land measuring an extent of 2.75 cents in Survey No.174/34 situated at Tharnapuri Village, Kallakurichi Taluk, Kallakurichi District. However, the said representation was not considered, as on date. Hence, this writ petition. 3. Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government’s Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and submitted that the petitioner’s representation dated 11.03.2026 will be considered within a period of eight weeks. 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 5. Considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 11.03.2026, after issuing due notice to the petitioner and other aggrieved persons, if any, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 16356 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 02-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VM To: 1. The District Collector, Collectorate, Kallakurichi - 606 202. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), RDO Office, Kallakurichi - 606 202. 3. The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Kallakurichi - 606 202. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 16356 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM WP No. 16356 of 2026 02-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis