Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3161 (RAJ)

AAKIL S/O HANIF v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4718/2026 · 2026-04-23

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:17170] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4718/2026 Aakil S/o Hanif, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Tilakpuri, Police Sta- tion Pahari, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arafat Hussain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 23/04/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Sec- tion 483 of BNSS in FIR No.335/2025 registered at Police Station Pahari, District Deeg for offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2)(a) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66D IT Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Similarly situated co-ac- cused-Rashid, Naim, Sakil, Sahil and Ummar have been enlarged on bail by Coordinate Bench of this Court on 30.03.2026. The case of the present petitioner is akin to them. Petitioner is behind the bars since 24.12.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose [2026:RJ-JP:17170] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4718/2026] would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, con- sequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material avail- able on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/ demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Aakil S/o Hanif, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subse- quent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/42