30.07.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 597. Kausik (Rejected) CRM (A) 2066 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Harishchandrapur PS Case No. 1308 of 2025 dated 09.12.2025 under Section 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/109/3(5) of the BNS, 2023. And In the matter of : Jamil Akhtar @ Lalbabu @ Lalbabu ……Petitioner. Mr. Arup Sarkar Mr. Sourav Mukherjee Mr. Gourav Roy ……for the Petitioner. Mr. Tirtheswar Das ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent. Some of the accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail. One of the accused persons has been granted bail in connection with the instant case. So far as the present petitioner is concerned, he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in connection with the instant case. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail, draws the attention of the Court to the statement of the injured. Statement of the injured reflects the name of Lalbabu. 2 Having regard to the complicity of the present petitioner, I am not inclined to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, CRM (A) 2066 of 2026 is dismissed. The Investigating Officer of the case is present in Court. His further appearance before this Court is dispensed with. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)