1 CGHC010076312021 2026:CGHC:35759 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1616 of 2021 1 - Neelima Tamrakar W/o Arun Kumar Tamrakar, Aged About 50 Years Working As Authorized Agents Of Adarsh Credit Co-Operative Society, Ltd Registration No. Mscs/cr/269/2008 Central Office Udaipur Rajastan With Agent Code 1773102 R/o 19/af Pocket Maroda Sector Bhilai District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Union Of India Through Central Registrar Ministry Of Farmer Welfare Department Of Agriculture Co-Operation And Farmers Welfare Office Of The Central Registrar Of Co-Operative Societies Krishi Bhavan New Delhi., District : New Delhi, Delhi 2 - Commissioner Of Central Registrar Ministry Of Farmer Welfare Department Of Agriculture Co-Operation And Farmers Welfare Office Of The Central Registrar Of Co-Operative Societies Krishi Bhavan New Delhi., District : New Delhi, Delhi 3 - Registrar Adarsh Credit Co-Operative Society, Ltd Registration No. Mscs/cr/269/2008 Central Office Udaipur Rajasthan., District : Udaipur, Rajasthan 4 - H.S. Patel Liquiditor Adarsh Credit Co-Operative Society, Ltd Registration No. Mscs/cr/269/2008 14 Vidya Vihar Colony, Usmanpura, Ahmadabad- 380013 Gujrat., District : Ahmadabad, Gujarat 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh -- Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from CIS system) For Petitioner : Mr. Nitesh Sahu, Advocate For Respondents/UOI : Mr. Abhishek Banjare, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Raj Kumar Sahu, Advocate BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 12/08/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this petition seeking following relief (s) :- “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the records pertaining to impugned order of the respondents authority for the kind perusal of the Hon’ble Court. 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to return the amount of the investor in the scheme launched by the respondent No.3. 10.3 Any other relief which the Hon’ble Court may deem fit, in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner would submit that petitioner is not an investor but agent through whom, other persons have invested the amount with respondent No.3, therefore, relief is sought against respondent No.3 to return back the amount to the investor. 3. In the writ petition though name of investors have been mentioned, however, the investors have not been arrayed as party petitioner. Petitioner has not sought any relief for herself but for other persons, who are not party to the writ petition, therefore, this writ petition is not maintainable. 4. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as not maintainable. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram