1 CGHC010303642026 2026:CGHC:37015 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6154 of 2026 Nilesh Kumar Shukla S/o Lt. Shri Brijendra Prasad Shukla Aged About 58 Years Presently Posted As Block Resource Coordinator, Block Baikunthpur, District Korea (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction (D.P.I), Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Joint Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, District- Korea, Chhattisgarh 4 - Mission/ Managing Director Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan (Formerly S.S.A), Raipur (C.G.) SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2026.08.19 17:33:20 +0530 2 5 - District Project Coordinator Samagra Shiksha, District Korea (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Vijay Ojha, Advocate For State/respondent nos. 1 to 3 : Ms. Akansha Verma, Panel Lawyer For Respondent nos. 4 to 6 : Shri Animesh Tiwari, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 19.08.2026 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioners, who are working in the department of respondents/Samagra Shiksha are seeking a direction towards the respondents authorities to regularize their services on the post of Block Resource Coordinator (BRC). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been in continuous service since 08.03.1995, i.e., for nearly three decades. It is further submitted that the concerned department has already sought the approval and concurrence of the Finance Department for the regularization of the petitioners on their respective posts. However, the 3 petitioners' claim/representations for regularization have not yet been decided by the competent authority. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State as well as respondent Nos. 4 to 6 submits that, if the petitioners' claim/representation (Annexure P-3) is still pending before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided by passing a necessary order, in accordance with law, within a period of 50 days. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the pleadings and documents. 5. Having considered the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to consider and decide the petitioners' claim/representation by passing a necessary order, in accordance with law, within a period of 50 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 6. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge shoaib