Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3160 (AP)

VRM GRANITES v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/15363/2026 · 2026-06-14

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010291452026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 15363/2026 Between: 1. VRM GRANITES, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, M.VENKATA RAO, S/O VENKATA SUBBAYYA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OFFIEE AT D.NO.2- 187, POST OFFIEE ROAD, SANMPUDI, SINGARAYAKONDA VILLAGE, PRAKASAM DISTRIET, ANDHRA PRADESH-523101. 2. SRI LAKSHMI SRINIVASA, S/O MASS BRIQUETTES, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, CHIMALA VENKATARAJA, S/O RANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O OGURU VILLAGE, KANDUKUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.-523 105. 3. CHIMALA VENKATARAJA,, S/O RANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O OGURU VILLAGE, KANDUKUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.-523 105. 4. G.JASWANTH REDDY,, S/O SUBBAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC MANAGING PARTNER, SRI LAKSHMI SRINIVASA BIO MASS BRIQUETTES, R/O 21-5-30, JNS TEMPLE, KANDUKUR TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.-523 105. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522 237. 2 2. THE ANDHRA PRADESH CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED APCPDCL, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, VIDYUTH SOUDHA, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT-520 001. 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, OPERATIONS CIRCLE, APCPDCL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, OPERATIONS, APCPDCL, SINGARAYAKONDA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, , OPERATIONS, KANDUKUR, SINGARAYAKONDA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER OPERATIONS, KANDUKUR, SINGARAYAKONDA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the Respondent No.4 in issuing proceedings vide bearing No.DEE/OSD/SKD/D,NO 523/2026 dated 03.04.2026 (Received on OB.06.2026) for disconnecting Petitioners HT Service Connection vide bearing No.PKM850 as dehors jurisdiction and ultra vires the vested powers, per se illegal, manifestly arbitrary, whimsical, vindictive, high-handed, unfair, capricious, unjust, unreasonable and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India besides being opposed to the very spirit and object of General Terms and Conditions of Supply of Distribution and Retail Supply Licensees in AP, APERC Electricity Supply Code, 2004, APERC Regulation No.7 of 2004, Electricity Act and Rules made thereunder and violative of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently to set aside the same by restoring the Petitioners HT Service Connection vide bearing No.PKM850 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to restore the Petitioners’ HT Service Connection vide bearing No.PKM850 by considering Petitioners’ application vide bearing No. CPALDO12604308846 dated 06.06.2026, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass 3 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. AKULA SRI KRISHNA SAI BHARGAV Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ENERGY The Court made the following: 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 15363/2026 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive and no further adjudication is necessary in the present Writ Petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition becomes infructuous. Recording the said submission, Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 15.06.2026 TTPPSS//BBSSPP 5 12 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 15363/2026 15.06.2026 TTPPSS//BBSSPP