Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31597 (PNJ)

RAMA GUGNANI v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/21850/2026 · 2026-07-20

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 131 RAMA GUGNANI STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: Present: TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA inclined to entertain the petition, l permission to withdraw the 2. 3. July 20, 2026 Jaspreet Kaur IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RAMA GUGNANI Versus PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Rajeev Lochan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Arora, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) After arguing for some time and realising that the Court is not inclined to entertain the petition, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn. , 2026 Jaspreet Kaur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-21850-2026 Date of decision: July 20, 2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondents TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Vikas Arora, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. After arguing for some time and realising that the Court is not earned counsel for the petitioner seeks (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE  : Yes/No : Yes/No , 2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondents After arguing for some time and realising that the Court is not earned counsel for the petitioner seeks JASPREET KAUR 2026.07.21 10:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh