NANDU KASHYAP @ NAND KUMAR KASHYAP v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
WPS/734/2020 · 2026-08-18
Shri Sanjay K Agrawal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 31595 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 31595 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010029462020
2026:CGHC:37094
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 734 of 2020 1 - Nandu Kashyap @ Nand Kumar Kashyap S/o Shri R. Kashyap Aged About 46 Years Working In Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, R/o Madhuvan Road, Dayalband, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District - Bilaspur Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhavan, Raipur, District - Raipur
Chhattisgarh.,
District
:
Raipur,
Chhattisgarh 2 - The Joint Director, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, R.D.A. Bhavan, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur,
Chhattisgarh 3 - The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Dantewada, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 & 2/State : Mr. Sharad Mishra, P.L. For Respondent No. 3 : Mrs. Swati Agrawal on behalf of Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate
2
SB – Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 19/08/2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has made representation to respondent No. 3 for regularization on 26/11/2019 (Annexure P/8) but it has not been considered, therefore, respondent No. 3 may be directed to consider and decide petitioner’s representation.
2. Learned counsel for respondent No. 3 submits that petitioner’s representation will be considered in accordance with law.
3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
4. Be that as it may, respondent No. 3 is directed to consider and decide petitioner’s representation dated 26/11/2019 (Annexure P/8) for regularization on its own merit within 3 months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, by passing a reasoned and speaking order, absolutely in accordance with law. Petitioner is at liberty to file additional documents/judgments in support of his representation.
5. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. No cost(s). Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
JUDGE Harneet