Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010584212024 NC: 2026:KHC:39413 WP No. 27265 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 27265 OF 2024 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN:
SRI. NARAYANASWAMY, S/O BYLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO.35, ASSESSMENT NO.29, NELAGADARANAHALLI VILLAGE, 1ST MAIN, WARD NO.41, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA, BENGALURU - 560 058 …PETITIONER (BY SMT. KAVITHA D., ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/S. CANARA BANK, (REGISTERED UNDER THE BANKING COMPANIES (ACQUISITION AND TRANSFER OF UNDERTAKINGS) ACT, 1907) (ERSTWHILE M/S. SYNDICATE BANK) YESHWANTHPURA BRANCH, NO.47, 1ST CROSS, GOPAL COMPLEX, S.C. ROAD, YESHWANTHPURA, BENGALURU - 560 022 IFSC CODE: CNRB0010428 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER/MANAGER. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. PREETHU R., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. VIGNESH SHETTY, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010584212024 NC: 2026:KHC:39413 WP No. 27265 of 2024
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Smt.Kavitha D., counsel for the petitioner and Smt.Preethu R., counsel on behalf of Sri.Vignesh Shetty, for the respondent appeared in person. 2. This petition is filed seeking following reliefs: (a) Issue writ of mandamus to respondent Bank not to take any action against the schedule property and to accept the petitioner's representation dated 27.09.2024 vide Annexure-M accepting to disclose the legally dischargeable amount as on date and grant him a moratorium time of three months to clear the said amount. (b) Issue such other orders or direction/s as may be deemed fit to grant, including cost of the case, in the view of facts and circumstances of this above case in the interest of justice and equity. - 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010584212024 NC: 2026:KHC:39413 WP No. 27265 of 2024
3. The petitioner contends that he has submitted representation dated 27.09.2024 vide Annexure-M. His grievance is that the same has not been considered as of today. 4. Counsel for the respondent submits that an appropriate orders may be passed. 5. The oral submission is noted. 6.
Taking note of the submission made by the respective parties, the respondent is directed to consider the representation dated 27.09.2024 submitted by the petitioner within two weeks from the receipt of certified copy of this order in accordance with the law. 7. With the above observation, writ petition is disposed of. It is needless to observe that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11