Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31571 (PNJ)

RAJ KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/5509/2001 · 2026-07-20

Pankaj Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[219] Raj Kumar State of Haryana and ot Coram : Present: PANKAJ JAIN [1] writ petition has been rendered infructuous. [2] present writ petition is [3] disposed off 20.07.2026 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-5509 Date of Decision : Raj Kumar versus State of Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Mr. R.S. Chahal, Advocate for the petitioner. **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) At the outset, counsel for the petitioner writ petition has been rendered infructuous. In view of the statement made by present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands disposed off. 20.07.2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 5509-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision : 20.07.2026 …Petitioner ….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. tement made by counsel for the petitioner, the as having been rendered infructuous. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No submits that the present counsel for the petitioner, the All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.07.20 18:55 I agree to specified portions of this document