1 CGHC010204692020 2026:CGHC:37095 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2366 of 2020 1 - Pratik Singh S/o Shri Jai Singh Aged About 25 Years Resident Of Flat No. 408, Puja Paradise In Front Of Science College New Sarkanda Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Naya Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Guru Ghasidas University Koni, Bilaspur Through Its Registrar Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Secretary - Chhattisgarh Board Of Secondary Education Raipur Pension Bada Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Secretary Central Board Of Secondary Education Shiksha Kendra, 2 Community Center Preet Vihar Delhi. 110092, District : New Delhi, Delhi ... Respondent(s) 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harshmandar Rastogi, Advocate For Respondent No. 1/State : Mr. Pranjal Shukla, P.L. For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Neeraj Choubey, Advocate For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Alok Bakshi, Advocate For Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Ankit Swarnkar on behalf of Mr. T.K. Tiwari, Advocate SB – Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 19/08/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner’s representation dated 11/05/2020 (Anneuxure P/6) has not yet been considered by the respondent No. 3, therefore, he may be directed to consider and decide petitioner’s representation. 2. Learned counsel for respondent No. 3 submits that petitioner’s representation will be considered and decided in accordance with law. 3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 4. Be that as it may, respondent No. 3/competent authority is directed to consider and decide petitioner’s representation dated 11/05/2020 (Annexure P/6) on its own merit within 6 weeks from today by passing a reasoned and speaking order, absolutely in accordance with law. Depending upon the result of the said order filed by the respondent No. 3, petitioner will be at liberty to file 3 representation before the respondent No. 2 University and it shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. No cost(s). Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE Harneet