30.07.2026 Serial no. 272 [G.S.D] CRM (M) 1589 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Baishnabnagar PS Cse No. 92 of 2026 dated January 25, 2026 u/s 103(1)/61(2)/85 of the BNS, 2023, GR No. 21 of 2026. -And- In the matter of : Santosh Mandal … Petitioner(s) Mr. Sobhendu Sekhar Roy Mr. Amarendra Chakraborty Mr. Tonmoy Chatterjee … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Subrata Mukherjee Mr. Sanjib Das … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner – being the husband, is in custody for more than six months and has been made an accused in the present case where unfortunately the death of his wife took place. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and draws the attention of the court to the statement of the minor child as well as post mortem report. Having considered the stage of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Rejected. However the petitioner would renew his prayer for bail at the appropriate stage. 2 Accordingly, CRM (M) 1589 of 2026 is dismissed. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)