- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010004832024 NC: 2026:KHC:39156 WP No. 342 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 342 OF 2024 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SRI RAGHAVENDRA C.S. S/O SEETARAMU C. R/AT O.2319/A, 3RD MAIN, 3RD CROSS, VINAYAKA NAGAR, PADUVARAHALLI, MYSURU-12 PRESENTLY WORKING AS POURAKARMIKA, MYUSURU CITY CORPN. MYSURU-570012 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJASHEKAR S.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIKASA SOUDHA, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-01 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010004832024 NC: 2026:KHC:39156 WP No. 342 of 2024 2. DISTRICT URBAN DEVELOPMENT CELL OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MYSURU DISTRICT, MYSURU REP BY PRESIDENT, SELECTION & DIRECT RECRUITMENT AUTHORITY & DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MYSURU DISTRICT -571129 3. MYSURU CITY CORPORATION MYSURU-570004 REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. ASHVINI PATIL, AGA FOR R1 & R2; SMT. GETHA DEVI. M.PPANNA, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DATED:15/12/2023 VIDE NO. CEAST(4) /CR/16/2023-24 ISSUED BY THE R3 VIDE ANNEXURE-A. b) DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER FOR HIS APPOINTMENT AS PURAKARMIKA PURSUANT TO HIS APPLICATION DATED: 25/06/2018 VIDE ANNEXURE-D. C) GRANT SUCH OTHER AND FURTHER RELIEF/S AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT AND PROPER UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THIS CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE & EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010004832024 NC: 2026:KHC:39156 WP No. 342 of 2024 ORAL ORDER 1. Respondent No.3 has filed a memo for disposal stating that the petitioner has been appointed as a Poura Karmika. In view of the same, nothing survives for consideration in this petition and the petition has rendered infructuous. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the contents of the memo. 3. Memo dated 19.07.2025 is placed on record. 4. In view of the same, the writ petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE RK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3