Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31560 (CAL)

ANIL KUMAR GUPTA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/16340/2026 · 2026-07-31

Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

31.07.2026 Ct. No.18 Sl. No.3 akd W. P. A. 16340 of 2026 [Dr. Anil Kumar Gupta -Vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors.] Mr. Sachin Jain Mr. Chiranjib Sinha Mr. Dyutiman Banerjee … … for the petitioner Mr. Sukanta Chakrabroty … … for respondent no. 4 [High Court Administration] Mr. Lokenath Chatterjee Mr. Swarvanu Saha Ms. Sruti Datta … … for the State Mrs. Runu Mukherjee … … for respondent no. 3 [Union of India] 1. Affidavit-of-service filed in Court today is taken on record. 2. This writ petition has been filed seeking enforcement of the orders dated December 2, 2021. The two orders of even date were passed in O.A. 57 of 2019 and O.A. 531 of 2019 respectively. These orders were not complied and contempt applications were filed from these two orders, bearing numbers C.C.P. 42 of 2022 and C.C.P. 43 of 2022. These contempt applications are still pending before the Tribunal. 3. As held in the decision of this Hon’ble Court in the case of Anindya Sundar Das vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. reported in 2026 SCC OnLine Cal 5733, matters which are pending for a while cannot be taken up at this stage, by this Court, merely on the ground that the Tribunal is non-functional from September 9, 2025. 2 4. In view of the afore-stated decision as referred above, WPA 16340 of 2026 is disposed of. 5. The petitioner will be at liberty to take appropriate steps in the matter. 6. There shall be no order as to costs. 7. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on usual undertaking. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)