Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3154 (KAR)

MRS. NAGAVENI RAMESH v. STATE OF TELANGANA

WP/35069/2024 · 2026-04-06

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18919 WP No. 35069 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 35069 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MRS. NAGAVENI RAMESH WIFE OF MR. RAMESH LANKE, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. 2. MR. RAMESH LANKE, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, SON OF LATE MR. LANKE HANUMAIAH, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO. 93, 6TH MAIN, JAI BHEEM NAGAR, BTM LAYOUT I PHASE, BENGALURU - 560 068. 3. M/S. PENINSULA INFRA DEVELOPMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED, NO.127, 3RD CROSS, 13TH MAIN, BANK OFFICERS CHS, AICOBO NAGAR, BTM LAYOUT I STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 029. REPRESENTED BY DIRECTORS NAGAVENI AND RAMESH. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. TULSI KUMAR B.N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF TELANGANA REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18919 WP No. 35069 of 2024 CYBERABAD COMMISSIONARATE, RAIDURGA POLICE STATION, TELANGANA STATE. 2. MRS. SIRISHA D., AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, W/O. MR. ANIL KRISHNA GUNDALA, NO. 25, STHE TRAILS, OU COLONY, MANIKONDA, HYDERABAD-500 089. 3. MR. D. BRAMHANANDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, S/O. MR. CHANCHU REDDY, NO.2000/A4, 16TH CROSS, HADADI ROAD, THARALABALUR BADAVENE, DAVANAGERE - 577 005. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ANOOP KUMAR, HCGP FOR R1) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH OR SET ASIDE THE PROCEEDINGS INTITIATED BY THE RAIDURGAM POLICE, THE FIRST RESPONDENT, IN CRIME NO.1180/2024 U/S 318(4), 316(2) R/W 3(5) OF BNS IN CRIME NO.1180/2024 AT ANNEXURE Q DATED 6.12.2024. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18919 WP No. 35069 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo seeking withdrawal of the Writ Petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "The Petitioner has filed the above case for seeking quash or set aside the proceedings initiated by the Raidurgam Police. The relief claimed granted by the sessions court. Hence the writ has become infructuous. Wherefore, the petitioner respectfully prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above writ petition as infructuous, in the interest of justice and equity." In terms of memo, the Writ Petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE CBC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 120