AMAN YADAV ALIAS AMAN KUMAR ALIAS AMAN KUMAR YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./11852/2025 · 2026-04-07
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3154 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3154 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:9742 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 11852 of 2025
Aman Yadav @ Aman Kumar @ Aman Kumar Yadav, son of Ramesh Kumar
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party ---
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Arpan Mishra, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mrs. Kumari Rashmi, APP
--- 05/07.04.2026
Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 03.06.2024 in connection with Spl. POCSO Case No.65 of 2024, arising out of MGM (Mango) P.S. Case No.100 of 2024, registered under Sections 376 (2f) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and 6 of POCSO Act, charge has been framed under Section 376 (3) of IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, now pending in the court of learned Special Judge Exclusive (POCSO) Court, Jamshedpur.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bail application of the petitioner was rejected earlier in B.A. No.1588 of 2025 vide order dated 25.02.2025 and in the meantime, all the witnesses except one have already been examined before the court.
4. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the trial is at the fag end and the State would ensure that the remaining witness is produced.
5. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that the bail application was rejected earlier and the trial is at fag end, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Hench, this bail application is rejected.
6. However, the State is directed to ensure that the witness is promptly produced before the Court.
7.
Learned counsel for the State is directed to communicate this
order to the Superintendent of Police and also to the Director, Prosecution of the concerned district to ensure compliance.
2026:JHHC:9742 2
8. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:07.04.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:08.04.2026