CWP-9874-2026 [1] 126 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9874-2026 Date of decision: 20.07.2026 Beerbati Chaprana ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G. Haryana. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a Civil Writ Petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to handover the physical possession of the unacquired land to the petitioner admeasuring 401 square yards comprised in Khewat/Khasra No.907/1109, Rectangle No.45, Killa No.5/1 min, situated in the revenue estate of Village Mewla Maharajpur, Faridabad, Haryana. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner be permitted to give a detailed representation giving details of the Notification under Sections 4 and 6, if any, issued with respect to land in question and also giving details of the land which as per the petitioner has PAWAN KUMAR 2026.07.21 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-9874-2026 [2] remained unacquired. It is thus, prayed that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied in case the said representation is considered by respondent No.2 in accordance with law in a time bound manner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents-State has submitted that in case any such representation is filed by the petitioner giving complete details then the same would be considered within three months from today. 4. Keeping in view the abovesaid facts and circumstances, the present writ petition is disposed of with following directions/observations:- i) It would be open to the petitioner to file representation giving complete details with respect to land in question before respondent No.2. ii) In case any such representation is filed, then respondent No.2 is directed to consider and decide the same within a period of three months from the date of receipt of representation. In case, respondent No.2 finds that the pleas raised by the petitioner in the said representation are meritorious then necessary relief would also be granted to the petitioner expeditiously. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 20.07.2026 Pawan Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2026.07.21 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document