SMT PAVITHRA v. MANAGEMENT OF HINDUSTAND AERONAUTICS LIMITED
WA/1798/2026 · 2026-07-28
D K Singh, T M Nadaf
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 31524 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 31524 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010504522026 NC: 2026:KHC:39006-DB WA No. 1798 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT APPEAL NO. 1798 OF 2026 (L-RES) BETWEEN:
SMT. PAVITHRA W/O SHRI RAJI NAYAGAM AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO. G-234 5TH MAIN ROAD, HAL OLD TOWNSHIP VIMANAPURAM, BENGALURU - 560 017. …APPELLANT
(BY SRI CLIFTON D'ROZARIO, ADVOCATE A/W SMT. MAITREYI KRISHNAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
MANAGEMENT OF HINDUSTAND AERONAUTICS LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 REGISTERED AND CORPORATE OFFICE AT NO.15/1, CUBBON ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR.
2.
THE MANAGEMENT OF HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LIMITED
Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010504522026 NC: 2026:KHC:39006-DB WA No. 1798 of 2026
A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANY'S ACT, 1956 INDUSTRIAL HEALTH CENTRE MEDICAL DIVISION BENGALURU COMPLEX MARATHAHALLI POST BENGALURU - 560 037
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF MANAGER (HR).
3.
UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE NO.104, SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
4.
MANAGEMENT OF HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 REGISTERED AND CORPORATE OFFICE AT NO.15/1, CUBBON ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS GM(HR). …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI S.S.RAMDAS, ADVOCATE FOR SRI PRADEEP S. SAWKAR, ADVOCATE AND SRI S.R.KAMALA CHARAN, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1,R2 & R4;
ASG SERVED AND UNPRESENTED)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE DATED 16.07.2026 IN WRIT
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010504522026 NC: 2026:KHC:39006-DB WA No. 1798 of 2026
PETITION NO.3684/2026, AND CONSEQUENTLY REJECT I.A.NO.2/2026 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT AND ETC.,
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
This appeal is taken up for final disposal with the consent of both the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties.
2. The present appeal is filed against the order passed by the learned Single Judge vacating the interim order that had been operating in favour of the appellants for a period of six months. Learned Single Judge vacated the interim order on the ground that the writ petitions were not maintainable in view of the availability of an alternate remedy under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
- 4 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010504522026 NC: 2026:KHC:39006-DB WA No. 1798 of 2026
3. We are not expressing any opinion on the view taken by the learned Single Judge. However, we are of the considered view that when the writ petitions are still pending adjudication, it would not be appropriate to vacate the interim
order at this stage.
4. Accordingly, we dispose of the appeal requesting the learned Single Judge to decide the matter finally preferable as expeditiously as possible may be within a period of two months.
5. The parties are directed to extend full cooperation to facilitate early disposal of the writ petitions and shall not seek unnecessary adjournments before the learned Single Judge.
6. Till the writ petitions are finally decided by the learned Single Judge, the interim order dated 05.02.2026 which was in operation prior to the passing of the impugned order, shall continue to remain in operation.
- 5 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010504522026 NC: 2026:KHC:39006-DB WA No. 1798 of 2026
7. The parties are at liberty to file further pleadings and take all contentions as may be available under the law.
8. The writ appeal stands disposed of in the above terms.
Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
RKA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4