Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31516 (MAD)

Tvl SE TECHNO HUB v. The Assistant Commissioner

WP/19683/2026 · 2026-06-10

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 19683 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 19683 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.20983 & 20984 of 2026 SE TECHNO HUB (Rep by its partner Santoshkumar Krishnappa) 4/76, Inappasandram Village, 6th KM Bagalur Road, Nallur Post, Krishnagiri, Tamil Nadu, 635103 ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Assistant Commissioner Hosur North-II circle Hosur, Krishnagiri Tamilnadu ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records on the files of the Respondent herein in FORM GST DRC-07 with Reference No ZD331225039144S along with detailed order in GSTIN 33ADQFS3949D1ZT / 2021-22 for the tax Period APR 2021- MAR 2022 both dated 03.12.2025 and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Ms.S. Vishnupriya For Respondent(s): Mr.L.Gokulraj, Government Counsel (Tax) *********** https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19683 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER An order dated 03.12.2025 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. Mr.L.Gokulraj, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed after the period of limitation expired. 4. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that recoveries were made towards the tax demand under the impugned order and that the petitioner agrees to pay 25% after taking into account and giving credit to amounts recovered earlier. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle. 5. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand under the impugned order, after giving credit to amounts recovered earlier on the basis of verification, within thirty days from the date of receipt of https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19683 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. 6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 10-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To The Assistant Commissioner Hosur North-II circle Hosur, Krishnagiri Tamilnadu https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19683 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 19683 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.20983 & 20984 of 2026 10-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis