1 CGHC010096972024 2026:CGHC:37153 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1870 of 2024 Smt. Binda Bai W/o Shri Puran Singh Aged About 65 Years Resident Of Village Kormi, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Commissioner Bilaspur Division, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - The Tahsildar Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Khem Singh Mangeshkar S/o Shri Birjhuram, R/o Vollage Kormi, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Ajeet Kumar Yadav, Advocate For State : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, PL For Respondent No. 5 : Mr. D. K. Vishwakarma, Advocate Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 19/08/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this petition with the following reliefs:- Digitally signed by AMIT PATEL 2 “ 10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the records pertaining to the case from the respondent authorities. 10.2 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, thereby setting aside/quashing the impugned order dated 12.12.2023 (Annexure P/1) ” 2. After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to avail an alternate remedy by instituting suitable proceedings before the concerned competent Civil Jurisdictional Court for redressal of her grievance. He submits that the disputed issues involved in the matter can appropriately be raised and adjudicated upon before the competent Civil Court in accordance with law. He therefore, prays that the present petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent Civil Court and avail such remedy as may be available to her in law for redressal of her grievance. 3. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the submission advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is at liberty to avail the alternate remedy in accordance with law by filing an appropriate petition/proceeding before the competent Jurisdictional Court for redressal of her grievance. It is made clear that the petitioner shall 3 be at liberty to raise all such grounds and contentions as may be available to her in law and the competent Court shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the competent Court is at liberty to pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. 4. With the aforesaid liberty, this writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge AMIT PATEL