Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31505 (KAR)

SRI RAMACHANDRA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/35626/2024 · 2026-07-27

R Nataraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010719852024 NC: 2026:KHC:38832 WP No. 35626 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 35626 OF 2024 (LA-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAMACHANDRA S/O. LATE POORNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, 2. SRI. R. NAGARAJ, S/O. RAMACHANDRA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 3. SRI. MAHESH, S/O. RAMACHANDRA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 4. SRI. RAJESH, S/O. RAMACHANDRA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT. DEVANURU VILLAGE, UDAYAGIRI POST, KASABA HOBLI, MYSORE DISTRICT-562106. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. A.R. KRISHNA MURTHY, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY OF REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU -560001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MYSORE DISTRICT, MYSORE-570001. Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010719852024 NC: 2026:KHC:38832 WP No. 35626 of 2024 3. THE TAHASILDAR, OFFICE OF THE TAHASILDAR, MYSORE TALUK MYSORE DISTRICT-570001 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND SAKSHAMA PRADHIKARA, MYSORE, MYSORE DISTRICT-570001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ADITYA DIWAKAR, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENTS) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NOs.1 TO 4 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONERS DATED 21.07.1994 AND (PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A AND B) AND CONSEQUENTLY ISSUE A DIRECTION TO DE-NOTIFY THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY UNDER SECTION 48(1) OF THE ACT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioners. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010719852024 NC: 2026:KHC:38832 WP No. 35626 of 2024 2. The office objections are not complied, even after several adjournments. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9