Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31503 (CAL)

M/S. UMA UDYOG AND ANR v. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, PARK STREET CHARGE AND ORS

WPA/21185/2022 · 2026-07-30

Raja Basu Chowdhury

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

05 30.07.2026 sayandeep Ct 3 WPA 21185 of 2022 M/s Uma Udyog & anr. Versus The Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Park Street Charge & Ors. Mr. Ankit Kanodia Ms. Megha Agarwal Mr. Shovam Ojha Ms. Tulika Roy … For the petitioners. Ms. Manasi Mukherjee Mr. Bijitesh Mukherjee … For the State. 1. The learned advocate for the petitioners by placing before this Court the e-mail communication dated 6th June, 2026 would submit that he has instructions to withdraw the writ petition for the petitioners to avail the remedy available before the appellate tribunal under the WBGST/CGST Act, 2017. 2. Ms. Mukherjee, learned advocate appears for the State. She does not raise any objection. 3. Having regard to the aforesaid, let the writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the tribunal within a period of 4 weeks from date in accordance with law. (Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.) 2