Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31493 (KAR)

SRI PINAKI MUKHERJEE v. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA

WP/21858/2024 · 2026-07-27

Suraj Govindaraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010467512024 NC: 2026:KHC:38972 WP No. 21858 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO.21858 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI PINAKI MUKHERJEE S/O LATE SOUMEN MUKHERJEE, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.25, APPAYYAN LAYOUT, KONANAKUNTE CROSS, BENGALURU - 560 052 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. YODH SINGH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. AXIS BANK, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, NO.39/1, GROUND FLOOR, POST OFFICE ROAD, DUM DUM, NORTH 24 PARGANAS, WEST BENGAL - 700 028. BRANCH ID 2919, IFSC: UTIB0002919 Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010467512024 NC: 2026:KHC:38972 WP No. 21858 of 2024 3. LOAN RECOVERY DEPARTMENT AXIS BANK, REP. BY ITS MANAGER, NO.8, SONA TOWER, 4TH T BLOCK EAST, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA - 560 041. 4. HSBC BANK, BY ITS MANAGER, CREDIT CARDS DIVISION. INDIAN BRANCH NO.52/60, MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD FORT, MUMBAI PIN - 400 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAJESH VELLAKATT, ADVOCATE FOR R1 SRI. JAI M.PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3 VIDE ORDER DATED 11.11.2025, SRI. G.C. MAHABALESHWAR, ADVCOATE FOR R4 (VAKALATH NOT FILED)) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO ASSIGN THE CREDIT SCORE OF THE PETITIONER WITHOUT REFERENCE TO THE DISPUTED TRANSACTION DATED 20.03.2023 AS COULD BE NOTICED FROM THE STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT A COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNX-C. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010467512024 NC: 2026:KHC:38972 WP No. 21858 of 2024 ORAL ORDER 1. None appears for the petitioner today also despite the order dated 15.06.2026. 2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE PB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 78