Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3149 (JHR)

MD. NASIM v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2804/2026 · 2026-04-07

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:9711 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2804 of 2026 Md. Nasim, aged about 30 years, S/o Sajjad Hussain … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Shadab Eqbal, Advocate Mr. Ankit Raj, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Tarun Kumar, Advocate --- 02/7th April 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 150/2024 for the offence registered under Sections 448, 394, 302, 336, 427 of the Indian Penal Code and after commitment and transferred from the court of learned Magistrate to the court of learned Principal District and Sessions Judge Sessions Trial Case No. 61/2026 for the alleged offence under Sections 396, 412, 448, 436, 427, 120(B) of IPC, now said to have been pending in the court of learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ramgarh. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been made accused in this case only because his car was allegedly used in the commission of offence. The learned counsel has submitted that his brother-in-law is also a co-accused in this case. He has submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and there is neither any recovery from the petitioner nor any TIP has been conducted. 3. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer and has referred to the impugned order by submitting that the car of the petitioner was alleged to have been used for commission of offence and charge-sheet has been submitted under Section 396 of IPC. 2026:JHHC:9711 2 4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the submission that the only material which connects the petitioner is the alleged use of his car and also the fact that there has been neither any TIP nor any recovery from the possession of the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ramgarh in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 150/2024, subject to the following conditions: - (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 5. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 6. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 07.04.2026 Uploaded On: 08.04.2026 Mukul/-