Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:14948-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 309 of 2026 Shivam Sonwani S/o G. K. Sonwani Aged About 38 Years Address- Qtr No. 2g, Street M P R Zone- 01, Sector- 11, Khursipar, Bhilai, Distt.- Durg, (C.G.), Pin Code- 490011
... Applicant versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh- 492002 2 - Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission North Block, Sector- 19, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh- 492002 3 - Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission Through- Exam Controller, North Block, Sector-19, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh- 492002 4 - Hemchand Yadav Vishwavidyalaya Through- Vice Chancellor, Raipur Naka, Durg (C.G.)- 491001 5 - Hemchand Yadav Vishwavidyalaya Through - Registrar (Academic), Raipur Naka, Durg, (C.G.) - 491001
... Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant : Mr. Sateesh Kumar Sagar, Advocate For Respondent No.1/State : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Govt. Advocate For Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 : Dr. Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 : Mr. Neeraj Choubey, Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble
Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
Hon'ble
Mr.
Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
, Judge
Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 01.04.2026
1. Heard Mr. Sateesh Kumar Sagar, learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Government ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA
2 Advocate, appearing for the State / respondent No.1, Dr. Sudeep Agrawal, learned counsel, appearing for respondent Nos. 2 & 3 and Mr. Neeraj Choubey, learned counsel, appearing for respondent Nos. 4 & 5.
2. The present MCC has been filed by the applicants for restoration of WA No. 208 of 2026, which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 13.03.2026.
3. For the reasons mentioned in the application, same is allowed and WA No. 208 of 2026, which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 13.03.2026, be restored in its original number.
4. Registry is directed to list WA No. 208 of 2026 for hearing today itself. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra