30.07.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 284. Kausik (Rejected) CRM (M) 1601 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Tamluk Police Station Case No. 60 of 2026 dated 28.01.2026 under Sections 64/351(3) of the BNS, 2023. And In the matter of : XXXX ……Petitioner. Mr. Sabir Ahmed Mr. Dhiman Banerjee ……for the Petitioner. Mr. Goutam Dey ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in connection with the instant case. The statement of the husband of the victim, injury report do not support the prosecution case. Learned advocate for the State submits that case has been committed to the Court of Sessions. Considering the stage of the case and after taking into account the statement under Section 183 of the BNSS, I am of the opinion, some opportunity must be granted to the prosecution to adduce its evidence, at least the evidence of the victim is concerned. 2 Learned Trial Court would ensure that the evidence of the victim is over within a period of 5 months from the date of communication of this order. Both the State and the petitioner would communicate this order to the learned Trial court. With the aforesaid observations CRM (M) 1601 of 2026 is dismissed at this stage. Report and Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)