[2026:RJ-JP:17836] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 819/2026 Tarun Sain S/o Late Anil Kumar Sain, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Badi Mohalla, Devliya Kalan, Police Statio Bhinai, District Ajmer. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer) ----Accused-Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. -----Respondent 2. Ramlal Bhanbhi S/o Narayan, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Govliya, Bhinai, Ajmer. ----Complainant-Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 820/2026 Ankit Kumar Teli S/o Kailash Chand, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Indra Colony, Devliya Kalan, Police Station Bhinai, District Ajmer. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer) ----Accused-Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. -----Respondent 2. Ramlal Bhanbhi S/o Narayan, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Govliya, Bhinai, Ajmer. ----Complainant-Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Mahendra Shandilya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP Mr. Om Prakash, SHO Bhinai, Ajmer HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 28/04/2026 1. The present criminal appeal has been filed under Section 14A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 by accused-appellants- Tarun Sain S/o [2026:RJ-JP:17836] (2 of 3) [CRLAS-819/2026] Late Anil Kumar Sain and Ankit Kumar Teli S/o Kailash Chand being aggrieved by the order dated 08.04.2026 passed by Special Judge, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Ajmer in Second Bail Application Nos. 366/2026 and 367/2026, whereby the learned trial Court dismissed the bail applications filed on behalf of the appellants in connection with FIR No. 292/2025 dated 07.12.2025 registered at Police Station Bhinai, District Ajmer for offences under Sections 189(2), 109(1), 333 of BNS, 2023 and Sections 3, 25 of Arms Act and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(S) and 3(2)(va) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. 2. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants have filed these appeals after earlier appeals were dismissed by this Court as withdrawn vide order dated 17.03.2026. 3. Learned counsel further submits that the appellants are behind the bars since 18.12.2025 and police after conducting the investigation, has filed the charge-sheet on 05.03.2026. 4. Learned counsel submits that the case of appellants is at par with the other co-accused persons who have also been enlarged on bail by this Court by previous order while allowing the respective bail S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application bearing Nos. 1599/2026 and 1600/2026 vide order dated 17.03.2026. 5. Learned counsel also submits that appellants would not violate any condition imposed by this Court and further shall not attempt to make any contact with the complainant and the witnesses. In view of the long incarceration, learned counsel prays that the appellants may be enlarged on bail. [2026:RJ-JP:17836] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-819/2026] 6. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposed the bail. 7. This Court considered that appellants are behind the bars since 18.12.2025; no recovery is required to be made from them and the other co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail on similar grounds. 8. Consequently, the instant appeals are allowed. The impugned order dated 08.04.2026 passed by the Special Judge, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Ajmer is hereby set aside and it is ordered that the accused- appellants Tarun Sain S/o Late Anil Kumar Sain and Ankit Kumar Teli S/o Kailash Chand arrested in connection with the FIR No. 292/2025, shall be released on bail; provided they execute a personal bond in a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- each with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for their appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The appellants are further directed not to take undue advantage or misuse of liberty granted by this Court. 9. It is made clear that the observations, as made by this Court in the appeal, will not affect the trial of the case. 10. However, appellants are directed not to make any attempt to contact the complainant and the witnesses. In case any such attempt is made, then the Public Prosecutor shall move an application for cancellation of bail. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J PARSHANT /323-324