ANIL v. STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY
CWP/21996/2026 · 2026-07-20
Aman Chaudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 31474 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 31474 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 128
CWP-21996-2026 Date of Decision: 20.07.2026 ANIL ... Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. **** Present: Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Udit Garg, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
**** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
1.
Learned counsel submits that five candidates who have been granted the benefit of reservation under specific category of Deprived Scheduled Caste (DSC), certificates for which were either not possessed by them or were issued after the cutoff date, with regard to it, he shall submit a representation giving all necessary details, that may be directed to be decided in a time bound manner.
2.
Learned State Counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made and submits that in case the representation is made within four weeks, it shall be decided within four months in accordance with law.
3.
Ordered accordingly.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JULY 20, 2026.
JUDGE Rajender
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No
RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.07.20 18:32 I am the author of this document