Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31474 (PNJ)

ANIL v. STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY

CWP/21996/2026 · 2026-07-20

Aman Chaudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 128 CWP-21996-2026 Date of Decision: 20.07.2026 ANIL ... Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. **** Present: Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Udit Garg, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel submits that five candidates who have been granted the benefit of reservation under specific category of Deprived Scheduled Caste (DSC), certificates for which were either not possessed by them or were issued after the cutoff date, with regard to it, he shall submit a representation giving all necessary details, that may be directed to be decided in a time bound manner. 2. Learned State Counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made and submits that in case the representation is made within four weeks, it shall be decided within four months in accordance with law. 3. Ordered accordingly. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JULY 20, 2026. JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.07.20 18:32 I am the author of this document