Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31461 (CAL)

MRINAL KANTI CHANDRA v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

WPA/18468/2024 · 2026-07-30

Raja Basu Chowdhury

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

08 30.07.2026 sayandeep Ct 3 WPA 18468 of 2024 Mrinal Kanti Chandra Versus The UOI & Ors. Mr. Promit Majumdar … For the petitioner Ms. Manasi Mukherjee Mr. Bijitesh Mukherjee … For the CGST 1. The learned advocate for the petitioner by placing before this Court an undated letter, would submit that he has instructions to withdraw the writ petition for the petitioners to avail the remedy available before the appellate tribunal under the WBGST/CGST Act, 2017. 2. Ms. Mukherjee, learned advocate appears for the CGST authorities. She does not raise any objection. 3. Having regard to the aforesaid, let the writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the tribunal within a period of 4 weeks from date in accordance with law. (Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.) 2