R/CR.MA/19815/2026(GJHC240644002026) ORDER DATED: 25/08/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 19815 of 2026 ========================================================== KAVITABEN MANHARLAL @MANOJ BABULAL SONI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ========================================================== Appearance: MR VICKY B MEHTA(5422) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR ROHAN H RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR Date : 25/08/2026 ORDER [1.0] RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent- State. [2.0] The present application is led under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.No.11209016260284 of 2026 registered with Himmatnngar “A” Division Police Station, Sabarkantha, for the o.ences under Sections 316(2), 316(5), 61(2), 54 of BNS, 2023. [3.0] Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the o.ence. Investigation is over and charge-sheet has been led. Nothing is required to be recovered or discovered. He therefore submits that, considering the nature of the o.ence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions. [4.0] Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has R/CR.MA/19815/2026(GJHC240644002026) ORDER DATED: 25/08/2026 opposed the present application and requested to dismiss the present application for regular bail on the ground that the applicant is very much involved in the present o.ence and considering the gravity of o.ence, no case is made out to entertain present bail application. If the applicant is released on bail, possibility cannot be ruled out that the applicant will 5ee from justice. Therefore, present application does not deserve consideration. [5.0] While granting bail, the Court has to consider the involvement of the accused in the alleged o.ence, the jurisdiction to grant bail has to be exercised on the basis of the well settled principles having regard to the facts and circumstances of each case and the following factors are to be taken into consideration while considering an application for bail: (i) the nature of accusation and the severity of the punishment and the nature of the materials relied upon by the prosecution; (ii) reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witnesses and threat to the complainant or the witnesses; (iii) reasonable possibility of securing the presence of the accused at the time of trial or the likelihood of his abscondence; (iv) character behaviour and standing of the accused and the circumstances which are peculiar to the accused; (v) larger interest of the public or the State and similar other considerations are required to be considered. [6.0] I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the investigation papers. It is alleged that present applicant along with her husband running a marriage burrow namely ‘Divya Shakti’ and the complainant had approached to said marriage burrow and xed marriage of his nephew and for that the accused have received Rs.2.10 lakh R/CR.MA/19815/2026(GJHC240644002026) ORDER DATED: 25/08/2026 towards brokerage and marriage of the complainant’s nephew was solemnized with another lady and it is alleged that thereby present applicant has committed an o.ence of criminal breach of cheating and Rs.3/- were taken from the complainant and did not pay the same to the parents of the witness Chandaniben and thereby in total Rs.5.10/- brokerage received. If we accept the said allegation as it is, even though role of present applicant is limited to give promise or to solemnize the marriage of nephew of the complainant. Except this, no role is attributed to present applicant as member of looteri dulhan gang or not any other allegation is revealed against present applicant. Following aspects have been considered: (1) Investigation is over and charge-sheet is led; (2) Applicant is lady and behind the bar since 27/03/2026; (3) There is nothing to be recovered or discovered from the applicant; (4) Though the applicant is having past antecedent, she is presumed to be innocent till proven guilty; (5) Obviously commencement and conclusion of trial will take its own time; (6) Prosecution has failed to point out the circumstances to continue or prolong his detention. [7.0] This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra vs. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012]1 SCC 40 as well as in the case of Gudikanti Narasimhulu And Ors vs. Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in (1978)1 SCC 240. Obviously, the conclusion of trial will take time and keeping the accused behind the bars is nothing but amounts to R/CR.MA/19815/2026(GJHC240644002026) ORDER DATED: 25/08/2026 pre-trial conviction and therefore, considering the celebrated principle of bail jurisprudence is that “bail is a rule and jail is exception” as well as the concept of personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, present application deserves consideration. [8.0] In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a t case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.No.11209016260284 of 2026 registered with Himmatnagar “A” Division Police Station, Sabarkantha, on executing a personal bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-ve Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that she shall; (a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty; (b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution & shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police; (c) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week; (d) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Trial Court concerned; (e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in every month for a period of six months between 11.00 a.m. R/CR.MA/19815/2026(GJHC240644002026) ORDER DATED: 25/08/2026 and 2.00 p.m.; (f) furnish the Aadhaar card, email ID/present address of his residence to the Investigating O.icer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence/contact number without prior permission of Trial Court; (g) not to indulge in any illegal activity failing which learned trial Court shall issue warrant and cancel the bail of the applicant. [9.0] The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other o.ence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter. [10.0] Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law. [11.0] At the trial, the trial Court shall not be in5uenced by the observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail. [12.0] Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted. (HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,J) ILA Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: ILA PRAFULKUMAR PATEL(HC00194), Principal Pvt Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 25/08/2026 16:52:44